One of the biggest challenges in environmental protection is air pollution – for example through emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxide and particulate matter. In order to avoid harmful emissions even more effectively in future, we are committed to developing alternative methods of power generation and utilization in maritime transport, and we invest in new technologies. Examples of investment projects include the LNG Hybrid Barge, the MALS technology, dual-fuel engines and the preparation of our ships for shoreside power.
Further measures such as friction-reducing underwater coats and cutting-edge propulsion technologies have also contributed to the 70% reduction in fuel consumption by our fleet since 1990 – as have numerous energy-saving solutions in the hotel and restaurant areas. It has been proven that cruise ships are one of the most efficient means of transport with regard to CO2 emissions. Per person, a cruise ship emits around six times less CO2 than an automobile.
Prof. Dr. Ing. Holger Watter from the Maritime Center at Flensburg University of Applied Sciences is a renowned expert in sustainable power systems. He says: “Just 3% of CO2 emissions are generated by maritime shipping and travel. Ships are the most efficient means of transporting goods and people. They have emissions rates that are a fraction of those of other methods of transport (automobile, train, airplane). Maritime “power stations” achieve degrees of efficiency that are above those of shoreside stations.” Furthermore, cruise ships also provide hotel accommodation, catering and infrastructure for leisure activities, as well as simply transport. These additional services are included in the evaluation of power use.
We are continually reducing our sulfur emissions through the increased use of low-sulfur fuels. Since 2007, we have only been using low-sulfur fuels as a matter of course, in line with the legal regulations for the North and Baltic Seas. In all European ports since 2010, engines have been operating exclusively on diesel with a maximum sulfur content of 0.1%. We have been doing this in the Port of Hamburg since 2007. Sulfur emissions have thus been cut by 90%. This is a tangible result. Our motors can already process high-quality fuels such as low-sulfur HFO and marine gasoil (marine diesel).
Nonetheless, low-sulfur fuel is not available everywhere. According to experts from the CLIA (Cruise Lines International Association), demand cannot yet be met today. Therefore, the UN’s International Maritime Organization (IMO) has decided to introduce a plan that will be phased in gradually. Refineries will have to update their equipment in order to be able to produce the required amounts. We support this phased plan. In line with this plan, we have also been using fuel with a low sulfur content of maximum 1.0% along the coast of North America since August 2012. From 2015, we will meet the prescribed thresholds for emissions in the Sulfur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) through the use of filter technology or marine diesel. The area covered by the SECAs includes the North and Baltic Seas and a zone of 200 nautical miles in North America.
Overall, we are steering the right course in terms of environmental and climate protection. This is made clear by our key indicators for energy.
With the launch of our ninth ship, AIDAmar, in 2012, the overall energy consumption of our fleet appears higher than in 2011. However, if the new addition to our fleet is evaluated in the context of our largest ship class, then energy consumption remains the same as the previous year. In terms of increasing environmental friendliness, one major advance we made was in the use of alternative fuels – low-sulfur heavy fuel oil and gasoil with substantially reduced sulfur content.
ENERGY | 2011 | 2012 |
---|
Total energy consumption | 5.795.484 GJ* | 6.538.405 GJ |
Energy consumption on board | 5.787.600 GJ | 6.532.640 GJ |
From heavy fuel oil | 5.398.360 GJ | 4.051.320 GJ |
From gasoil | 389.240 GJ | 540.360 GJ |
Of which low-sulfur heavy fuel oil | k.A. | 1.940.960 GJ |
Fleet energy consumption | 7.884 GJ** | 5765 GJ |
* 40 MJ/kg fuel GJ = gigajoule **Diesel |
Water consumption per guest and per day was also further reduced in 2012 in comparison to the previous year. Whilst in 2011, 237.9 liters were consumed per guest per day, in 2012, only 233.7 liters were consumed per guest per day.